Friday, April 23, 2010

BLOGGING NEW MOON, pt. 3: What Dreams May Come

I've just started reading New Moon, by Stephenie Meyer. Entries about Twilight, the first book can be found in sidebar. Previous entries for New Moon can be found in the directory (now with pull-quotes).

Chapter 2: Stitches

So that stuff about the “six suddenly ravenous vampires,” alliterative though it was, bothered me a little. I think the problem was I immediately started doing vampire math: there are seven members of the Cullen family, and six of them are ravenous. So I just assumed Edward was the one she was leaving out. But we know that Alice was able to be around Bella when she was bleeding to death in Phoenix (and we will see shortly that she mostly keeps her head on straight in this fiasco). But neither of them seem to be the vampire Bella had in mind, because the first sentence of the next chapter is: “Carlisle was the only one who stayed calm.” So make that “four feverishly ravenous vampires,” one calm vampire, one Edward and one Alice. I know that doesn’t stand out on the page as much, but it has the advantage of being true at least.

The next sentence is the Big Love Season 1 poster of sentences: “Centuries of experience in the emergency room were evident in his quiet, authoritative voice.”


There’s only one thing wrong with these pictures! Centuries of experience! I mean, I don’t think they had ERs in the 1600s, but whatever! I like it anyway!

MACDUFF:
Oh, horror, horror, horror!

Banquo, awake and call thou 911!


The room clears of extraneous Cullens—Emmett and Rosalie drag the still-crazy Jasper outside and Esme excuses herself because of all the blood. Alice tries to help Carlisle as he and Edward carry Bella to the kitchen table. (She runs for Carlisle’s doctor bag and is back before they get in the room—if the Cullens move around their house at super-speed all the time, do they ever smash into each other in the hallways?) Edward is pissed off, and basically stands around doing nothing and seething, trying to nobly resist the urge to kill Bella (glass fucking houses, am I right?) until Alice and Carlisle finally persuade him to leave and go find Jasper. Bella is simultaneously in shock and humiliated—one of those understandably inexplicable reactions most people have to situations like this one (okay, situations not exactly like this one).

Carlisle numbs up Bella’s arm and starts taking the glass shards out of the gash. Bella notices Alice smile apologetically and slip out of the room too, leaving her alone with Carlisle. Bella is amazed at his Buddha-like calm and ability to resist the blood even Alice couldn’t stand to be around. “Clearly, this was much more difficult than he made it seem.” It’s almost like Bella is disappointed that he can resist killing her so easily! You don’t want to kill me? Why not? My blood is so sexy! Bella’s developing a weird complex.

She continues to fail to understand why Carlisle doesn’t just murder people and be done with it. “It didn’t make sense to me—the years of struggle and self-denial he must have spent to get to the point where he could endure this so easily.” Um, what kind of vampire is Bella going to become if all this moral stuff doesn’t make any sense to her? It would be kind of awesome if someone finally vamps Bella and she turns into a psycho killer and the Cullens have to kill her at the end of these books. Okay, that’s probably not going to happen. Don’t tell me if I’m right. But wouldn’t it be cool if I was right? I hope Mike Newton gets it first.

So Bella asks a lot of questions and Carlisle gives a lot of answers. For a while he’s pretty reasonable. He enjoys when his “enhanced abilities”—sometimes even his sense of smell—can help save a person who otherwise would have died. He finishes pulling the glass out and starts stitching Bella up. She tells him he tries “very hard to make up for something that was never [his] fault.” Carlisle didn’t choose this lifestyle, after all. Whoops, that’s an unintentional parallel to the gay community! Or like, the David Fisher gay community, at least!

“I don’t know that I’m making up for anything,” he disagreed lightly. “Like everything in life, I just had to decide to do with what I was given.”

Okay. Given by whom, you might be asking. That’s right: Carlisle is about to get religious on us. He starts talking about his proto-Pat Robertson father as he puts all of the bloody gauze in a crystal bowl and sets it on fire. Interesting imagery going on here.

“So I didn’t agree with my father’s particular brand of faith. But never, in the nearly four hundred years now since I was born, have I ever seen anything to make me doubt whether God exists in some form or the other.”

Note the capital-g “God.” Also, huh? Bella is just as shocked as we are that the conversation has taken such a turn, and we get a paragraph of Bella’s religious history. It’s pretty stereotypical—almost deliberately so. Bella is the standard non-denominational teen of the aughts. Charlie calls himself a Lutheran, “but Sundays he worshiped by the river with a fishing pole in his hand” (Bella was channeling Tom Waits for a second there). Renee tries out churches like some people try fad diets. It feels like we’re being set up for a religious conversion here. Secular girl finds God through the vampires? I worry about where this is going.



Carlisle goes on to say that “by all accounts we’re damned regardless. But I hope, maybe foolishly, that we’ll get some measure of credit for trying.” By all accounts? By what accounts? Maybe I haven’t read the Bible enough, but I can’t think of a single section that even touches on the eventual fate of vampires. Even in the Talmud! Also, uh, aren’t you guys fucking immortal? The afterlife is not so much a concern for you, right?

Bella says she doesn’t think it’s foolish to hope for heavenly rewards for vampires in the hereafter. Well, that makes one of us, Bella! Apparently even the other Cullens don’t agree—“Edward is with me up to a point,” Carlisle says. Which means Alice IS an atheist! I was right!


So where is the schism between Carlisle and Edward? Edward believes in God, heaven, and hell. But not for vampires. (And not because they are immortal and therefore it’s beside the point.) “You see,” Carlisle explains, “he thinks we’ve lost our souls.”

Hey, Edward—you’re a nice guy and all, but that is maybe the dumbest fucking thing I have ever heard. I mean, okay, there is a rich history of semi-batshit religious philosophy you can use to back up your ideas about the existence in the first place of souls, but your notion in the second place that becoming a vampire somehow gets rid of your soul is totally made up! It’s based on nothing! Bella should just say that she believes becoming a vampire gives you an EXTRA SOUL, so you can go to heaven TWICE, because such an opinion is just as valid as Edward’s.

Still, Bella is like, well, fuck, no wonder he doesn’t want to make me a vampire. Carlisle says he has to believe there is “something more” for someone like Edward. Being a nearly invincible super-powered vampire for all time isn’t good enough for you? You also need heaven? If you give a mouse a cookie, huh?

There’s some weird punctuation going on as Carlisle articulates the new wrinkle in our Central Philosophical Issue.

“But if I believed as he does…” He looked down at me with unfathomable eyes. “If you believed as he did. Could you take away his soul?”

It’s also a weird echo of the “would you want me to kill myself?” argument from the last chapter, but it makes even less sense. Edward is apparently some kind of scientist in the field of souls. Soulologist. Souloist. Ha.

Then Carlisle tells a weird story about how Edward’s mom told him to save Edward as they were both dying of the Spanish Influenza (it wiped out his whole family). We learn that his mom was named Elizabeth Masen and Edward once had green eyes. (It’s a three page story, and there’s very little to take away from it!) Carlisle didn’t exactly know how to make Edward a vampire, so he sort of had to improvise. This is after a few decades with the Volturi, right? Nobody ever brought it up, at a cocktail party or something? The moral of the story is that despite Edward’s stupid ideas about souls, Carlisle doesn’t regret saving him.

Speaking of our resident Souloist, he reappears to take Bella home. Alice takes her to change clothes first—her shirt is covered in blood. “I’ll get you something less macabre to wear,” Alice says. Vocab points for Alice! Upstairs, Bella tries to get a read on the severity of the situation, and Alice tells her Jasper is embarrassed. Bella wants him to know she’s not mad at all. Diplomacy points for Bella! Edward is all weird and dead-eyed and dead-voiced when they return. Alice makes sure Bella takes her presents—points to Alice for not being upset that her party got ruined. Nobody is happy, of course; when she and Edward get in the truck Bella rips the bow off her new stereo and throws it on the ground. Ouch.

Bella tries to apologize for bleeding, and Edward gets angry. He launches into this speech about how if she’d been dating Mike Newton none of this would have happened. Bella’s like, fucking Mike fucking Newton? “Mike Newton would be a hell of a lot healthier for you to with,” Edward says. Bella counters that she’d rather die.

“Don’t be melodramatic, please.”
“Well, fuck you,” I replied.


Okay, well, that’s what she should have said. The melodramatic pot is calling the melodramatic kettle melodramatic, you know? Edward doesn’t want to stay the night (melodramatic much?) So Bella invokes her birthday. They kiss, and it seems to cheer him up. She goes in the front door, and he sneaks to her room. After Bella talks to Charlie, she goes to the bathroom where she keeps her special pajamas for nights when Edward is around. Don’t get too excited—it’s nothing you’d see on Ashley Greene, say—just a “matching tank top and cotton pants.” Boring. If Alice slept, she’d go to bed in something involving straps and lace. And handcuffs, obviously. Bella goes to her room where Edward is waiting:

“Hi,” he said. His voice was sad. His eyes were wallowing.

Is this what you thought of, too?

She opens her presents: Carlisle and Esme bought her vouchers for plane tickets so she and Edward could visit Renee in Jacksonville. How is that going to be feasible? Bella points out that Edward will have to stay inside all day, it’s so sunny—he says he doesn’t mind. I think Renee probably will though, right?

Then she opens the present from Edward (and presumably Alice). It’s an unmarked CD; Edward puts it on.

I listened, speechless and wide-eyed. I knew he was waiting for my reaction, but I couldn’t talk. Tears welled up, and I reached to wipe them away before they could spill over.

Edward made a CD of his piano compositions! Awwwww! Good to see Alice found a use for her four-track recorder she bought back in the late 70s to make Yoko Ono-style field recordings. Bella’s arm starts hurting, and Edward shoots off super-fast to get her some painkillers.

People keep predicting Charlie’s death in this chapter—Edward wanted Bella to change out of her blood covered shirt a few pages ago because he’s worried she’ll “give Charlie a heart attack.” Now, Bella doesn’t want Edward to leave her bedroom for the Tylenol—“Charlie wasn’t exactly aware that Edward frequently stayed over. In fact, he would have had a stroke if that fact were brought to his attention.” Why does everyone think this dude is so fragile? He’d be pissed if you and Edward were actually fucking, but if he found out you just cuddled every night he’d probably just be confused.

Charlie doesn’t catch Edward anyway; he leaves and returns with pills and a glass of water so fast that the door he left open hasn’t swung back and closed yet. I get that vampires are fast, but they can also make water come out of a faucet at super speed too?

Edward seems distracted—he tells Bella he’s been thinking about “right and wrong.” Uh-oh. You know you’re in trouble when this motherfucker starts getting all moral. Bella tries to take his mind off it—they start making out and Bella pushes it further. “I was clearly beginning to cross his cautious lines.” So what does that mean exactly? Are clothes coming off? Details, Bella! “His body was cold through the thin quilt, but I crushed myself against him eagerly. Dry humping! We’re getting somewhere! Bella possibly has an orgasm:

I collapsed back into my pillow, gasping, my head spinning. Something tugged at my memory, elusive, on the edges.

Is Bella flashing back to some prior sexual experience? Has it been that long since she’s gotten off? She tries to get Edward to start up again, but he’s having self-control (read: erection) problems. “Which is tempting you more, my blood or my body?” Bella asks. That’s literally the most overtly sexual line we’ve seen so far. Bella puts her sore arm against Edward’s cold, ice pack body and tries to sleep—but then she realizes what was tugging at her memory before.

Last spring, when he’d had to leave me to throw James off my trail, Edward had kissed me goodbye, not knowing when—or if—we would see each other again. This kiss had that same almost painful edge for some reason I couldn’t imagine. I shuddered into unconsciousness, as if I were already having a nightmare.

Okay, so probably not an orgasm.

12 comments:

Kim said...

To be fair, Buffy did the whole vampires lose their souls thing first. Only in that the losing of the soul is what makes them unapologetically evil. It makes much more sense in that context. Well, I suppose it does if you don't dig deeply enough to consider that if a soul is what keeps a person good, then how do you explain evil humans?

You know, if churches played the whole vampire angle, they'd probably attract a lot more teenage girls. I mean, Twilight is bizarrely moral in many ways, even when it comes to the sex or lack thereof. Bitch Magazine had this editorial about it being "abstinence porn" that had some pretty interesting insights on the whole subject.

rosanne said...

Twilight is informed by the morals of its writer. Of course the characters that she loves the most are going to reflect her values. Well, not of course, but it isn't surprising. Also, I'm pretty sure that a lot of vampire lore refers to vampires as soulless, but I don't have any evidence on hand right now. Kim is right that vamp souls were a big plot driver on Buffy, but I'm pretty sure that Anne Rice's vampires didn't have souls either. I am not sure where Bram Stoker stood on the issue. Get back to you on that one.

At any rate, this kind of goes back to a comment I made here a while back about how SM's vampires don't really have to trade a lot in for becoming vampires. Almost all of the rest of vampire lore has some serious drawbacks to immortality, but all these guys do is sparkle and have to eat a deer once a month. I mean, fuck, sign me up.

rosanne said...

Oh, and re: Alice's vocab word of the day, did you know that there's an iphone app called "Defining Twilight: Vocabulary Practice for Unlocking the SAT, ACT, GED, and SSAT"? I find that slightly depressing, since most of the words that are probably in that vocab practice are used questionably in the actual text.

Kim said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kim said...

Yeah, I suppose I should have clarified that Buffy did it first with the modern mainstream-ish teen vamp pop culture. And honestly, I don't know if it was eve first in that odd little category. I just have an embarrassing level of love for that show. :)

The soul thing is actually present in quite a bit of vampire lore, whether its the definite lack of one or the definite having of one (such as LJ Smith and her literal soul mates thing) or the ambiguity as in Twilight. I believe, though I could be wrong, the whole vampires don't have a soul thing is what the idea that they don't have a reflection or the ability to show up in a photo is also based on.

As far as Dracula, one theory postulated by literary theorists (or at least the one I remember from lit class) was that he was a personification of the fear of the Victorians that humans were soulless and purely motivated by our physiology. Though, if I remember right, he does have what is referred to as a soul mate. Then again, that might be one of the movies and not that book. It's been ages since I've read it.

Rosanne - the lack of drawbacks struck me, too, especially how very indestructible they are. If the sun and other "traditional" methods don't kill them and they are able to enter a house without being asked, then what's to stop the bad guys from just running rampant and killing everyone in sight aside from the rule about not doing that? And what is Edward so whiney about? That he has to miss school every now and then so people won't think he's bathed in body glitter?

ZL said...

Why do the stakes (heh) have to be high to be a vampire? Do there have to be any stakes? I mean, doesn't Twilight operate under the assumption that the convoluted mythology around vampires is just that, a convoluted mythology?

Kim said...

I find the lack of traditional aspects bothersome not so much because they're the "right" way to write a vampire story, but rather because I don't understand, without them, exactly what it is in their world that does stop them from massacring or enslaving humans like cattle. I mean, sure, they have the Volturi and their rules, but why do the Volturi have the rules to begin with? What's the point of keeping their existence a secret? It's not like anyone could stop them from doing what they want since they're completely lacking in weaknesses or downsides in any way. I'm totally cool with the post-vampire myth aspect, but I do wish that she could have at least addressed the issue of why the Volturi choose to enforce the necessity of secrecy. I suppose that's not really the point of the story, nor is it something that should really be the focus, but it is one of those little details that annoyed me.

On a total blog fangirl note - I'm enjoying the ability to actually read/participate in a discussion on these books. After spending my undergrad career as a lit major, most of the people I know who are willing to discuss books with me would crucify me for attempting to discuss any young adult lit, much less Twilight.

rosanne said...

I think you are giving too much credit to Twilight when you say that it recognizes convoluted vampire mythology as convoluted. From what I remember SM has been pretty straightforward in saying that she didn't know much about vampire lore before writing the books and didn't do very much research into it, she just created a vampire myth that fit what she wanted. That's perfectly fine, and I surprisingly didn't have any problem accepting her version of a vampire, right down to the idea of their just being a different species, except for the fact that they weren't born but created. Whereas the Quileute (sp?) shapeshifters have the genes passed down through generations, the vampires are regular, mortal humans until they are transformed.

So, no, I suppose there doesn't have to be a tradeoff, but if there's not a tradeoff, not only the question Kim raised about their enslaving the entire human race, but also, why wouldn't everyone just end up a vampire? There is an assumption in all of this that human life is important and worth protecting, right? But in SM's world vampires don't get sick, they don't have to ever sleep, they can take advantage of every single minute, the only thing that they can't physically do is enjoy some delicious spaghetti carbonara (are tastebuds organs? do those die along with the liver and heart?) The point I am rambling on about is that vampires are dead humans that get to keep on doing all the operations of living, but they don't get to be alive. So is a beating heart and working organs the only thing they have to give up in return for their immortality?

All I'm saying is that the vampire's world according to Twilight is pretty solid and from the way SM presents it overall, it doesn't seem bad, but Edward feels some sort of guilt about being a vampire and that suggests that there SHOULD be some sort of tradeoff. We just aren't shown what the tradeoff is in Twilight world. And that's a little weak.

ZL said...

Um, Roseanne-- the drawback is you don't get to love Jesus and live forever in heaven. And I think the reason you don't vamp everyone is then there'd be no one to eat.

And also the Volturi. Not that they make any sense, but neither does the Vatican, their closest real life analog.

rosanne said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ZL said...

As someone who kind of wishes I spent my undergrad career as a lit major, I am also happy that people are reading this blog and discussing it and taking it at face value. What interested me in the first place was the idea that Twilight was so culturally radioactive, so it makes sense that people find it appalling we would be doing this. Whatever. I bring my copy of New Moon around Boston with my head held high. I mean, I keep it in my bag, but my head is held high.

Stephanie_DAnn said...

I think what Carlisle means when he says "by all accounts we're damned regardless" is not that he thinks they will be be sent to hell for all eternity. I think what he means is that normally (in SM particular vampire design) vampires never die. Living forever is the hell they are damned to. Living [forever] is hell. Not a lake of fire kind of hell--but an eternally a lonely, depressed 17 year old kind of hell. (Read or watch Tuck Everlasting if you find this theme interesting.) So far there's two ways out A) being chopped up and burned and B)suicide via the Volturi. Oh by the way, there's this secret council of Vampires that just became relevant/will become really relevant late. Hey, at least it's not the "evil vampires are coming, oh wait they are already here" with virtually no lead up.

Edward assumes that if he ever did either of those he would just stop existing because he has no soul. Carlisle hopes for a reward after death, but I don't get that because I don't think Carlisle will ever be killed or commit suicide.

Is (earthly) eternal life the trade off?